The components of an Eligible Termination Payment

Filling in the details on the eligible terminations payment schedule

The component parts of an eligible termination payment which can be included in the Taxed And Untaxed Elements of the Retained Amount of the Pre and Post June 83 Components! (Any questions?)

 concessional component

 post-June 1994 invalidity component

 undeducted contributions

 non-qualifying component

 capital gains tax exempt component

 excessive component

 pre-July 83 component

 post-June 83 component, which is the ETP reduced by the other components.

 

When you return income for an eligible termination payment, you will use the 'Statement of Termination Payment' form provided by the payer. This form will provide you with a break up of all the various components, which you will then enter, into the form that Taxboss will display on the screen.

 Taxboss will do all the calculations on the figures that you enter. It will work out the amount that should be entered into the return form at the eligible termination payment item of the return form (and the additional income if there is any excessive component) and then enter that amount for you.

 Transcribing these details from the form supplied by the payer to the return (or Taxboss dialog box) can be a rather nerve racking experience if you are not sure what it is you are doing, so it might be useful to have a working knowledge of what each component represents.

 Section 27B and 27C include various components of ELIGIBLE TERMINATION PAYMENTS in assessable income.

But what are ELIGIBLE TERMINATION PAYMENTS?

They are defined in sec 27A (1), the definition section for this part of the Assessment Act. You will find a simplified list in the previous topic.

Be prepared for information overload if you want to look up the definition in the Income Tax Assessment Act. It covers four pages and is a bit like one of those television commercials that offer not just the product they are advertising, but also sets of steak knives, all sorts of gadgets and even the kitchen sink.

So let's assume you know what the eligible termination payment is, but how much of it is included in assessable income?

Section 27B lays down the rules for the inclusion of payments received on retirement, in full, in assessable income.

(1) If an ETP (other than a death benefit ETP) is made in relation to a taxpayer in a year of income, the taxpayer's assessable income of the year of income includes:

 (a) the taxed element of the retained amount of the post-June 83 component; and

 (b) the untaxed element of the retained amount of the post-June 83 component.

 (… 1A deals with death benefits in much the same way

So Section 27B(1) requires the taxpayer to include in assessable income ...

(a) the TAXED ELEMENT of the RETAINED AMOUNT of the POST JUNE 83 COMPONENT

(b) the UNTAXED ELEMENT of the RETAINED AMOUNT of the POST JUNE 83 COMPONENT

Once we know what…

Taxed And Untaxed Element? (more on this later)

Retained Amount? (this is the amount that the taxpayer does NOT roll over)

Post June 83 Component? (all will be revealed shortly!)

…are we will know how much of the eligible termination payment has to be included in assessable income.

But first, we will have to look a bit more closely at the component parts of an eligible termination payment

Component parts of the eligible termination payment

Sec 27 AA tells us that an Eligible Termination Payment consists of one or more of the following components:

 (a) the concessional component;

 (aa) the post-June 1994 invalidity component;

 (b) the undeducted contributions;

 (c) in the case of an immediate annuity eligible termination payment--the non-qualifying component;

 capital gains tax exempt component

 (ca) the excessive component;

 (d) the pre-July 83 component, …

(e) the post-June 83 component, which is the ETP reduced by the other components.

 Let's look at each of those in a bit more detail…

Concessional Component - only 5% is included in assessable income and is taxed at the marginal rate for the taxpayer

This one will be dealt with in the next topic - it deals with termination payments made to people who have to leave their employment earlier than they would have voluntarily chosen due to invalidity, retrenchment or the operation of an approved 'early retirement scheme. In fact it does not exist any more, but you might come up against it in payments which have been rolled over.

Post-June 1994 Invalidity Component - only 5% is included in assessable income and is taxed at the marginal rate for the taxpayer

This is the new version of what used to be the concessional component. It will be dealt with in the next topic.

Undeducted Contributions - they are NOT included in assessable income at all!

These are the amounts you have paid for your superannuation, and for which you have received no tax deduction or rebate.

The definition is found in in section 27 A(1) - the definitions section - as so much of the eligible termination payment as is attributable to contributions, made by the taxpayer (or any other person) AFTER 30/6/83 to a superannuation fund for superannuation benefits, in respect of which no tax deduction is allowable or has been allowed to the taxpayer (or other person).

Section 27 A (7)(b) removes the employer from the class of other persons who can make 'undeducted contributions'

Most employers make a contribution to their employees superannuation. If they somehow managed not to qualify for a tax deduction for such payments such amounts CAN NOT be added to your undeducted contributions.

What about rebates allowed for superannuation contributions?

Can an amount be included in undeducted contributions if it has been allowed as a rebate against tax payable? (HINT Refer para 11-070 of CCH Master Tax Guide.)

The answer is YES. The Assessment Act does not exclude amounts from undeducted contributions just because they qualified as REBATES

Non Qualifying Component - 100% is included in assessable income and is taxed at the marginal rate for the taxpayer

(we are not going to worry too much about this one - it is an anti tax avoidance measure to combat certain schemes - unless you received a commutation or residual capital value payment in respect of an annuity which was purchased otherwise than by roll over - it is not going to affect you. Refer para 11-075 of the CCH Master Tax Guide if you are interested)

Capital Gains Tax Exempt Component - NOT included in assessable income at all!

This one can probably be described most succinctly by quoting from the editorial of the Financial Review newspaper of February 14, 1996.

THE Leader of the Opposition, Mr John Howard, has made a strong pitch for the small business vote - (by promising) to provide substantial capital gains tax rollover relief for small businesspeople. In broad terms this should enable most of them to largely neutralise the impact of CGT when they sell one business and use the proceeds to buy another.

At present the only real CGT concession provided to small business is the ability to get an exemption from paying tax on half of any gain which results from building up the goodwill of a business. Introduced in 1992, it went part of the way towards correcting the CGT's failure to make any allowance for the risks involved in building up a business. The concession acts as an incentive to encourage more people to accept those risks and so bolster a sector which is an important source of job creation.

The trouble with this arrangement, however, is the way it fails to incorporate any incentive to reinvest the gain in a new business. A rollover system addresses this limitation.

Under Mr Howard's proposal the main restrictions are understood to be a stipulation that it can only be used by businesses worth less than $5 million (the existing 50 per cent concession has an indexed limit of just over $2 million) and can only be used once every five years.

Both of these conditions are justified since it is sensible to target only "smaller" enterprises and to limit the possibility of the concession being unreasonably exploited.

While it is possible to debate the merits of any rollover system - certainly more can be said when the full details of Mr Howard's proposals are known - there is little doubt that people who are prepared to accept the substantial stress and risks involved in starting and building up their own businesses deserve CGT relief.

For some policy analysts a preferable concession would be to allow small businesspeople to roll over their gains, tax free, into superannuation - a policy which would both provide genuine tax concessions while also boosting national saving. The main drawback of this arrangement, however, is the way it could drain start-up capital out of a part of the business world which is already struggling to find funding.

Given this, an initiative which gives relief from CGT, while at the same time providing an incentive to re-invest the money in another business, makes a lot of sense.

Subsequent to its election, the new Government made good on it's undertakings whilst in opposition. You can read about these measures and their precise implementation in the CCH Master Tax Guide.

Paragraph 12-280 provides details of the arrangements for rolling of the gain on active assets of a business when they are replaced with other active (business) assets.

But paragraph 11-032 is the one of most immediate interest to us and should be referred to for full details. In briefest outline, the legislation allows a taxpayer to treat a capital gain as an eligible termination payment if:

The net value of the assets does not exceed five million dollars ($5 m)

The assets are used by the taxpayer in carrying on a business (active assets)

The assets were active assets immediately before the disposal (or with 12 months of cessation)

the capital gains tax exempt amount can not exceed the capital gains tax retirement exemption limit ($500,000)

Excessive Component - 100% is included in assessable income and is taxed at the top marginal rate

The Assessment Act provides some hefty deductions for contributions to superannuation funds. Where such deductions are available, you can be sure that attempts will be made to exploit them for their tax advantages rather than for their intended purpose of encouraging people to make a serious attempt to provide for their own security in the twilight of their lives. The superannuation provisions have been the targets of some truly exotic schemes.

To place a check on such practices, the law has placed an upper limit on the amount, which can be claimed as a deduction for sums contributed for any particular person, known as the REASONABLE BENEFIT LIMIT. ( you can read more about it at para 11-350 to 11-430 of the CCH Master Tax Guide if you are interested.)

Pre-July 83 component - only 5% is included in assessable income and is taxed at the marginal rate for the taxpayer

You can read about the history of the rather complicated way of including eligible termination payments in assessable income in the previous topic.

 

If you don't wish to, you will just have to take our word for it that prior to 1 July 1983, only 5% of amounts received on retirement from an employment were included in assessable income.

When the government of the day moved to change the law to include 100% of such payments in assessable income, it was decided to make the new arrangements apply prospectively. In other words, any part of the payment that could be attributed to employment before the law changed would continue to be included under the old way of doing things.

So only 5% of any eligible termination payment attributable to service before 1 July 1983 would be included in assessable income.

Post-June 83 component - 100% is included in assessable income, but a rebate ensures it is taxed at a concessional rate of tax, which depends upon whether the source is taxed or untaxed.

This is just what is left of the Eligible Termination Payment after deducting all the other components.

(this is where we explain what we mean by taxed and untaxed amounts)

The rebate, which effectively provides a concessional rate of tax on the post June 83 components of eligible termination payment, works in a similar way to the imputation credit, allowed on dividend income.

You may be aware that if you receive dividend income, you are allowed a rebate which represents the tax paid by the company on the income it would otherwise have used to fund a bigger dividend for you, the shareholder, had it not been required to pay the company tax.

In a similar way, super funds are required to pay tax of 15% on their income, so that tax can be claimed back by the pensioner in his tax return as a rebate.

If the taxpayer receives the pay out in the form of an eligible termination payment rather than as a pension, a rebate will be allowed on the same principle.

The legislation, which provides for this rebate was announced by a Prime Minister who had won an election not had expected him to win. He had done this by offering generous tax rate cuts, which came to be known as the 'L-A-W law' tax cuts. He devised a way to renege on the 'LAW law' tax cuts and make the budget look better at the same time. He did this by getting revenue from the superannuation funds in the short term rather than waiting for what he could collect when people retired and started paying income tax on pension or lump sum payments. Hence the rebate on pensions, and eligible termination payments, when they funds start paying out of taxed funds.

What rate of tax is applied to eligible termination payment that is included in assessable income?

(Details are provided in paragraph 11-118 of the CCHN Master Tax Guide)

It all depends upon

the age of the taxpayer

where it came from (taxed or untaxed source)

when the payment was received

the amount received.

Rate of tax: payments received in the 1998 income year,

Are you less than 55 years of age?

20% if the source was taxed

30% if the source NOT taxed

Are you 55 years or age or over

First $90,474

nil if the source was taxed

15% if the source was NOT taxed

 

Amounts in excess of $90,474

15% if the source was taxed

30% if the source was NOT taxed

(Threshold for 1998 income year was $90,474 but this changes each year)

 

related topics | apprentice tax practitioner program | tax law