Dividends
What are UNFRANKED & FRANKED dividends, and IMPUTATION CREDITS?
Franked dividends - the dividends paid by companies which pay company tax
What is the imputation credit?
So what is returned as dividend income? (The lot! Franked, Unfranked and Imputed Credit!)
Section 160 AQU to the rescue - the franking rebate
Partners in a partnership and trust beneficiaries receiving dividends
What are UNFRANKED & FRANKED dividends, and IMPUTATION CREDITS?
You will be aware that a tax is paid by a company on it's income.
Before the introduction of imputation, taxpayers who received dividends from companies were really being taxed twice on the same income.
Think about it.
The company pays tax on income it derives, and then pays out what is left of that income to the shareholders as dividends.
The shareholder then paid tax on the dividend income - representing the income of the company upon which tax had already been paid.
Franked dividends - the dividends paid by companies which pay company tax
Under the imputation system which applies to dividends paid after 1/7/87, the taxpayer is allowed a rebate against dividend income which represents the amount of company tax paid by the company paying the dividend.
The rebate will only be allowed against dividends paid by companies which have paid Australian company tax - these are known as franked dividends.
Under section 160 AQH,
when a resident company pays a frankable dividend ...(That is, one paid out of profits on which company tax has been paid) ...
it must give the shareholder a statement showing
(i) the franked amount of the dividend
(ii) the unfranked amount - the amount of the dividend that is not franked
The sum of these two amounts is the total amount of dividend received
(iii) the imputation credit
What is the imputation credit?
This is the amount of the dividend which represents
company tax paid by the company.It will also include other amounts - can you guess what they might be?
The
franked dividends received by the company.If you are interested you can see a list of all the amounts that can increase and decrease a company's franking credit at paras 3.630 & 3.640 CCH Master Tax Guide.
So what is returned as dividend income?
The taxpayer must include in his assessable income the total of the
unfranked amounts
franked amounts
That all makes sense - since that is the total amount of dividends received
But the total amount of
imputation credits
must also be included in income - this represents money that has not been received by the taxpayer - it is the company tax paid by the company ...
Section 160 AQT (1) requires an amount ascertained by the formula ...
|
|
Company tax rate |
|
franked amount of dividend * |
------------------- |
|
|
1 - company tax rate |
In other words ... the applicable tax rate is 36% so the multiplier will be ...
|
|
Company tax rate |
.36 |
|
franked amount of dividend * |
------------------- |
----- |
|
|
1 - company tax rate |
1 - .36 = .64 |
So you multiply your franked dividend by 36/64 to get you imputation credit
So the taxpayer is worse off than he was before - he is paying tax on more than he received in dividends ...
Section 160 AQU to the rescue - the franking rebate
Section 160 AQU allows a rebate equal to the franking rebate where an amount was included in income section 160 AQT - the section we just learned about.
Let's take the case of a taxpayer on the top marginal tax rate who receives a totally franked dividend of $100.
|
Franked amount |
$100 |
|
Unfranked amount |
$ 0 |
|
Imputation credit (included by section 160 AQT) = 36/64 * 100 |
$ 56.25 |
|
|
______ |
|
total amount included in assessable income |
156.25 |
Now, the good news…
|
tax payable on 100 @ 47 cents in the $(top rate) |
$ 47 |
|
Imputation credit allowed under section 160 AQU (see above) |
$ 56.25 |
|
|
______ |
|
Net reduction in tax payable on assessable income |
$ - 9.25 |
So, for the taxpayer in the top tax bracket, no tax is paid on the dividend income received. It is even better for the taxpayer in a lower tax bracket.
If you work through the example above for a taxpayer on the 20% rate, you will observe that the rebate allowed will be greater than the tax attributable to the dividend received. In other words, he will be receiving a rebate in respect of company tax paid by the company paying the dividend which he can apply to tax payable on other forms of income
Section 160 AD sets a
maximum amount for the total of all rebates. It is the total tax payable on an assessment.So, the taxpayer can not receive a refund in respect of imputation credits not required to offset his own tax.
Moreover, such
credits can not be offset against medicare levyPartners in a partnership and trust beneficiaries receiving dividends
Section 160 AQW deals with the case of partnerships and trusts ...
It talks about the section 160 AQT amount -
that is the amount of imputation that is included in income.
This imputation credit is included the trust or partnership amounts
In other words, the
partnership is deemed to have derived the total of the franked amounts, the unfranked amounts and the imputation credits.So, the partner must return his share of this amount as assessable income.
But ... Section 160 AQZ allows a
rebate in the partner's assessment.This rebate will be a proportion of the total imputation credit included in the partnership income.
No prizes for guessing that this
proportion is the same as the proportion of the total partnership income received by the partner.Let's put some figures to that to illustrate what we mean...
|
Partnership Franked amount |
$10,000 |
|
Partnership Unfranked amount |
$ 0 |
|
Partnership Imputation credit |
$ 5,000 |
|
|
______ |
|
total amount included in net income of partnership |
$15,000 |
Let's say the partner receives 50% of the partnership income
That means he is also entitled to 50% of the imputation credit - the section 160 AQT amount
|
Taxable distribution received from partnership |
$ 7,500 |
|
Income received by taxpayer from other sources |
$20,000 |
|
|
______ |
|
Taxable income of partner |
$ 25,000 |
|
tax payable on taxable income of $25,000 = |
$5474 |
|
Partner is entitled to 50% of the $5000 imputation credit |
$2500 |
|
net tax is $5474 less $2500 = |
$2794 |
Section 160 AQX and AQY deal with trustees and beneficiaries
Section 160 AQY allows a rebate against tax payable by a trustee when trust income has not been distributed.
Section 160 AQX allows a rebate against the tax payable by a beneficiary on his taxable income equal to the potential rebate amount in relation to the trust amount - once again let's illustrate that with figures ...
|
Trust Franked amount |
$1,530 |
|
Trust Unfranked amount |
$ 0 |
|
Trust Imputation credit |
$ 1,470 |
|
|
______ |
|
total amount included in net income of trust |
$3,000 |
Let's say the beneficiary receives a distribution of one third of the trust income
|
Taxable distribution received from trust |
$ 1,000 |
|
Income received by taxpayer from other sources |
$10,000 |
|
|
______ |
|
Taxable income of beneficiary |
$ 11,000 |
|
tax payable on taxable income of $11,000 = |
$1120 |
|
Beneficiary is entitled to 1/3 of the $1470 imputation credit |
$ 490 |
|
net tax paid by beneficiary = 1120 less 490 = |
$ 630 |
Remember, rebates can not exceed the tax payable, so if the trust had expenses of $4000 a loss of $1000 would have been incurred
|
Trust Franked amount |
$1,530 |
|
Trust Imputation credit |
$ 1,470 |
|
|
______ |
|
total amount included in net income of trust |
$3,000 |
|
less deductions of 4000 |
$3,000 |
The trust has a net loss so the potential rebate exceeds the tax payable therefore no rebate allowed
Where a non resident receives dividends these are usually subject to dividend withholding tax.
If the dividends have been fully franked, they will not be subject to withholding tax. This also applies to non resident partners and beneficiaries
![]()
related topics | apprentice tax practitioner program | tax law